Sourcing & Recruitment Info

Tips | Hacks | Tricks | Ideas | Information | Innovation | Opinion

Google X-raying LinkedIn

With the new limitation on LinkedIn searches it is now more important than ever to know how you can access LinkedIn’s data through Google. There is more to X-raying than meets the eye, so I am laying out the methods and the tricks in the post below.


1. The Basics

The basic of X-raying is using either the site: or inurl: operator in Google, followed by the URL of the site you are searching on. In LinkedIn’s case you can use or The difference between these is that the inurl: operator searches in the whole URL while the site: just searches in the domain (the beginning of the URL).

For LinkedIn X-raying I suggest to use site: to avoid the various redirect pages like this one.


In order to narrow your searches just to the user profiles use a standard expression from the profile visible for Google. To check these profiles go to an incognito window or log out of your LinkedIn. They look something like this.


For quite a while “people you know” worked really well, but this is not a standard expression anymore. The highlighted “you know in common”, “get introduced” or “find a different” expressions seem to be just as good now, and since typically you have some other narrowing keywords you can frequently go just simply for “you know” as well.

With the addition of your specific keywords your search string looks something like this. Do note that using AND-s and brackets make absolutely no change in the results at all. If they help you to oversee the syntax of your string feel free to use them, if you are a minimalist feel free to get rid of them.


Note: Keep in mind that Google is always just estimating the number of results, the number of actual results may be vastly different from what it guessed.

If you add the words “People also viewed” you have an additional benefit: when reviewing the results in Google you can immediately decide whether your keywords are in the profile of a person, or are relating to someone else (see the right hand section on the above picture). If the keywords are before “people also viewed”, you are good.


2. Getting around the maximum keyword barrier: Google Custom Search

The biggest limitation of the method above is a maximum cap of keywords: 32 (operators are not included, just keywords). If you plan to use more, you can easily set up a new search engine called Google Custom Search.

In this window you can add one or more sites to focus on, essentially telling Google that whatever search you will run, the engine should always automatically add the site: operator to it. Contrary to the information provided there, writing or is not only enough, but actually will result in a couple more relevant profiles than going with*.


Officially this engine has no maximum limit, in practice I’ve run a couple of really long texts where the search did not work anymore. Should never encounter any problems until around 120 keywords, which is a 4x increase from 32.

The created engine will have a direct URL, one you can share with your colleagues as well in case you are cooperating and running searches with the same premises. You can set up a new engine for every search you make, or have a couple engines set up – that can come handy for example for searching in specific countries (see below).

Alternatively, you can try using Bing where the keyword limit is higher, but Bing delivers typically around 5-10% less relevant results.

3. Tricks

Of course most of us love that with LinkedIn’s in-built functionality you can search within specific fields like the job title or current company. Although most of these is not directly possible, there are a couple of tricks how you can fine tune your search and in some cases even get more out of X-raying than you would from the native search.

3.1. Searching in a specific country

Searching in a specific country or specific countries is pretty easy to do: just use the search In the custom search engine you can add multiple URLs, so you can search for French speakers for example with a custom search engine focusing on, and To not waste any of the precious LinkedIn searches you have when finding out the country codes, check out this link where Jacco gathered all of them.

Caution: using narrows your results to US.

3.2. Searching for a more specific location

In most countries the built-in LinkedIn search offers you a more specific location search by choosing a certain geopgraphical region.  This information is visible on the profile, hence findable via Google.

If you do not know what LinkedIn sets as a location to the region you target, either make a non-area specific X-ray search and browse through a couple of results to see your options (Google shows the location in the result list as it is seen on LinkedIn), or set the location on your profile to the target adress (provide a zip code), and see how how the system names that city.

But there is one more thing not to forget – the different places where this information can be present on a profile. Let’s examine this with the below example: “you know” iso (9000 OR 9001) vda “antwerp area”

There problem with this search is that it includes for example this:


But it does not include this:

david stuart

I do not know about a way to solve both, so depending on whether you want to see more results (with a higher risk of false positives) or less (with assurance that all of them come from the region you need) you have two options.

The solution to the first issue is pretty handy, and comes from the source code of the LinkedIn page and Googles abilities. Although this word is not always visible when you open a result, the source code always contains the word “Location” before the geographical area. So to make sure you only get results from the targeted region add this to your string: “location * antwerp”. Unfortunately as stated above it does exclude some “real” results as well, so it’s only advised to use it if you have significantly more results than in our example. “you know” iso (9000 OR 9001) vda “location * antwerp”

If you know you can not expect too many candidates in the area and you definitely do not want to loose them because of the technology, first start with simply adding antwerp. This will reveal many false positives (former company locations, school names, company names, etc), but will also reveal the different ways how Linkedin can phrase that area, possibly in other languages. You can combine this information later to: “you know” iso (9000 OR 9001) vda (“antwerp area” OR “antwerpen en”)

3.3. Searching in job titles

I believe this is a frequently used field on LinkedIn’s built-in search. You certainly can not make such a structured search from Google, but you do have an option to search in the job titles. This is done by adding the “at” expression after the job title. Example: “you know in common” “qa manager at” ts

Now obviusly this can be expanded like any other string part: “you know in common” (“qa manager at” OR “quality manager at”) ts

To not limit yourself to the last keyword, you can use “you know in common” (“qa manager at” OR “qa manager * at” OR “qa manager * * at”)

While reviewing the results you may notice that whenever in the Google snippets the highlighted keywords of the position come before the “you know in common” part, they are in the headline of your candidate (thus probably it is his most recent position).

3.4. Searching for languages

This is my favorite, something which is not possible even with the built-in search. From Google you can actually search for speakers with a certain level in a language.


The levels LinkedIn differentiates are:

  • Elementary proficiency
  • Limited working proficiency
  • Professional working proficiency
  • Full professional proficiency
  • Native or bilingual proficiency

It depends on you and your position, but typically most cases when you would search for a language require at least a professional working proficiency. Thanks to the phrasing, this search will find all three top options. “you know” “arabic * professional” OR “arabic * native”

Of course you can go just for native: “you know” “arabic * native”

Or just for native and full professional as well: “you know” “arabic * full” OR “arabic * native”

3.5. Using Google’s ability to search for similar terms, and other versions of the same word

Some very basic words by default have an associated list of synonyms, and searching for a certain phrase will give you some other relevant results. Google also negates the need to come up with the differently typed versions of the commonly used words – it checks them automatically (example: engineer searches for engineers and engineering as well).

Note: if you use ” ” at any concrete word or expressions it will not look for any alterations, just the main word.

Even with pretty specific expressions, you can use a – between the words to let Google know that your keywords are related, and you are interested in results similar to that expression. Do not leave spaces after the first word, otherwise the – will simply be counted as a NOT. Take a look at what this  can do for you: “you know” water-treatment -“water treatment”

This search shows the results who would not show for a regular water treatment search, but pop up because of the additional Google operator. Obviously in a real search you would not exclude the concrete expression, I just wanted to showcase the additional results.

Besides running more advanced searches, this is as well a great way to learn more about your position and get new keywords.

3.6. Searching members of certain LinkedIn Groups

The profile page visible to Google has all the Group memberships listed.


This means that with a simple search like this, you can search for the members of a certain group – and of course you can continue narrowing down your search with other keywords. “Lean Six Sigma Slovakia” “you know”

3.7. Searching for people who are still studying

On LinkedIn people are asked to write in details about their education, and as we are bragging creatures, we like to include even those we did not finish yet. The system in these cases adds the “expected” word to the profiles.

From a recruitment perspective this means that if you are looking for people who will finish the degrees shortly, or for high prospect interns who will not finish it for a year or so, you can use this piece of information. (2015 * expected) “information technology”

4. To sum up

This is certainly a different type of challenge, but with every door closing a new door (or window?) opens. From now on at least there will be no difficulty whatsoever finding out who the 3rd degree connections are (not that it was too difficult, but got to look at the bright side :)). I hope this guide helped you to comply with the new system – let me know if anything is not clear. Even more so, let me know if you believe there is anything else important/helpful to add.

5. Update

Since the writing of this post there is currently an alternative way of targeting Locations, Job titles and  Target companies. Find out more on this link.



  1. Hey Vince, interesting take on X-ray, I hadn’t seen You Know being used as a filter, I’d always stuck with the faithful -inurl:jobs -inurl:title -inurl:dir -url:jobs2
    Is there any reason you chose the former, do the results differ? Chris

    • vinceszy

      January 14, 2015 at 7:03 pm

      Hey Chris,

      The results do not differ much, there is always a slight difference of 1-2 results: sometimes it’s more, sometimes less results, no really consistent trend.

      So the suggestion of the sentences is simply due to the fact that they are shorter, easier to remember and explain for anyone. I believe it’s an advantage as well that you can check on your results anytime in an incognito window and see if there is any change in the visualisation of the public profile, then adjust accordingly.


  2. I’m all for simplicity!

  3. Hi Vince,
    I have another technique I use when x-raying. You can differentiate false results by using the order your search terms appear in the Google Snippet. The keywords you search for are highlighted in the snippet and the order is the same as it appears on the public profile. So if the job title appears after ‘People also looked at’ then you know it is not related to that profile.
    I use this a lot when analyzing search results with software but it is also useful when manually working through results.
    Hope this helps

  4. Nice post, Vince. As the person who popularized the use of “people you know” in the LinkedIn hack about 7 years ago, I appreciate the reference and understandably it’s a moving target that we have to keep an eye on as websites inevitably change their formatting. Sourcers with free LI accounts will have to embrace this method more with the new restrictions. Your other points around countries, languages, keyword variants, groups, Google CSEs, etc., are all particularly well-explained and thus deserve kudos even though these points have been mentioned in many other blogposts elsewhere.

    • vinceszy

      January 22, 2015 at 9:20 am

      Hi Glenn,

      Thanks for the comment. Certainly many things were already written by others as well, but had not seen so far a full recap of what people can do – with the changes from last years practices (many sourcers I speak to simply never had to X-ray LinkedIn) I felt the need for it.

      I have not seen the languages-search, synonym-search and student search on other blogs – was hoping some of them is a discovery. Oh well, maybe next time 🙂

  5. Great article Vince! But what I couldn’t stop noticing while reading is the nice font, and the whole blog layout! IT was almost distracting! 🙂

    I guess i had this effect on me since I am postponing my web sites revamp for years!… #guilty!

  6. Hello Vince
    Thank you for some great insights.
    I have been trying to utilise your tips around searching ‘current job title’ to filter my results – however, it doesn’t seem to be working correctly – my search is returning many results where the job title I am searching is a previous job title dating back many years. Is there anything else you can share that I can try to really focus on my results in ‘current’ job title?
    Thanks Vince

  7. Thank you for such a detailed article.

    • Vince,

      Thanks again for the writeup and share.

      When you get a chance do have a look at this video which covers what you have spoken about including the new way to serach for accurate titles, company etc.

      It also showcases the power of Google to find high quality prospects by
      + Current Year
      + Recommendations
      + Email ids
      + Activity

  8. Pierre-Olivier Jouanny

    February 20, 2017 at 6:55 pm

    Great article ! Do you use some tool to help you source more efficiently ? I have not found one, so I developped to export profiles to my recruiting board directly from linkedin and have my conversion rate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


© 2020 Sourcing & Recruitment Info

Rights owned by Vince Szymczak Up ↑

Share this with your colleagues!
Hide Buttons